<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Acid Buzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/</link>
	<description>Things that Eric A. Meyer, CSS expert, writes about on his personal Web site; it&#039;s largely Web standards and Web technology, but also various bits of culture, politics, personal observations, and other miscellaneous stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Design - standards based web design, development and training  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Some links for light reading (28/3/05)</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Design - standards based web design, development and training  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Some links for light reading (28/3/05)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-11637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  for light reading (28/3/05)			 			 				March 28th, 2005			 				 Emergent Microformats 	That Acid Buzz 	Nifty Corners: rounded corners without images 	The Next Big Thing in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  for light reading (28/3/05)			</p>
<p> 				March 28th, 2005<br />
 				 Emergent Microformats 	That Acid Buzz 	Nifty Corners: rounded corners without images 	The Next Big Thing in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Holsten</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5636</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Holsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While this may not be discussed by the article, both the firefox and safari teams have gotten quite far in implementing the fixes for the acid2 test. To my knowledge, safari only has one bug left. The article only needs to be concerned with IE, everyone else doesn&#039;t need to be prodded]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this may not be discussed by the article, both the firefox and safari teams have gotten quite far in implementing the fixes for the acid2 test. To my knowledge, safari only has one bug left. The article only needs to be concerned with IE, everyone else doesn&#8217;t need to be prodded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leif halvard silli</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5634</link>
		<dc:creator>leif halvard silli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I  have to say I found your notes about Håkon&#039;s article unfair. Well, I agree that the acid2 should be conceived as a matter for all browsers --- and as fair as I know all released web browsers (for the Mac) fail that test, as of yet.

But Håkon&#039;s article was spesificly about IE7 and not about acid2. So of course he had to put it like he did. I got an entirely different view of what he was saying after I read his article, than from what you were saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  have to say I found your notes about Håkon&#8217;s article unfair. Well, I agree that the acid2 should be conceived as a matter for all browsers &#8212; and as fair as I know all released web browsers (for the Mac) fail that test, as of yet.</p>
<p>But Håkon&#8217;s article was spesificly about IE7 and not about acid2. So of course he had to put it like he did. I got an entirely different view of what he was saying after I read his article, than from what you were saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porneL</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>porneL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All browsers have some obvious shortcommings. Gecko doesn&#039;t support &lt;code&gt;display: inline-block&lt;/code&gt; or &lt;code&gt;display: run-in&lt;/code&gt;,  ignores soft hyphens and causes all kinds of headaches for developer that adores CSS support in Opera7 :)

I&#039;m looking forward to that test as everyone there has something to iron-out, but Microsoft by far has weakest CSS and seems to be least interested in improving it, so I&#039;m not surprised that Hakons challange is targetted towards MS.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All browsers have some obvious shortcommings. Gecko doesn&#8217;t support <code>display: inline-block</code> or <code>display: run-in</code>,  ignores soft hyphens and causes all kinds of headaches for developer that adores CSS support in Opera7 :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to that test as everyone there has something to iron-out, but Microsoft by far has weakest CSS and seems to be least interested in improving it, so I&#8217;m not surprised that Hakons challange is targetted towards MS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson Vibber</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5348</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson Vibber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Opera causes you problems? The only major problems you should have are those relating to badly-written markup or out-of-date scripts. Any minor problems can easily be catered for.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re kidding, right?  I suppose &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/12/06/opera-bugs-li-first-line/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these :first-line CSS bugs&lt;/a&gt;, one of which causes text to disappear, are caused by invalid markup or out-of-date scripts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Opera causes you problems? The only major problems you should have are those relating to badly-written markup or out-of-date scripts. Any minor problems can easily be catered for.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding, right?  I suppose <a href="http://www.hyperborea.org/journal/archives/2004/12/06/opera-bugs-li-first-line/" rel="nofollow">these :first-line CSS bugs</a>, one of which causes text to disappear, are caused by invalid markup or out-of-date scripts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hester</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5347</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Kyle, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5333&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment #5&lt;/a&gt;, wrote: &lt;em&gt;&quot;Opera causes the most serious problems for me (our company no longer supports Opera by default).&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To single out probably the most capable browser available right now, used by millions of users worldwide, strikes me as wrong. Opera causes you problems? The only major problems you should have are those relating to &lt;strong&gt;badly-written markup&lt;/strong&gt; or &lt;strong&gt;out-of-date scripts&lt;/strong&gt;. Any minor problems can easily be catered for.

Each browser has layout differences. Firefox does not display things exactly the same as Opera, nor IE6/Win. Then there&#039;s Safari et al. But if your code is valid, it should work in any major browser without hassle. Opera offers nothing to warrant blocking it completely.

Opera 8 (due any time now) offers many improvements. Opera 7 already has great support for CSS2.1 and some CSS3 - media queries, generated content, lots of things no-one can use much because Firefox or IE can&#039;t handle them.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Kyle again: &lt;em&gt;&quot;On the other hand, I feel Opera changes it&#039;s layout engine far too often, causing severe display difficulties distinguishing between different versions.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve seen no evidence of &quot;severe&quot; changes, and I&#039;ve been testing in Opera since version 6. You could test for the different versions with the User Agent string though. Anyway, at least they&#039;re constantly upgrading their browser, unlike a certain Redmond-based company I could mention...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kyle, in <a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5333" rel="nofollow">comment #5</a>, wrote: <em>&#8220;Opera causes the most serious problems for me (our company no longer supports Opera by default).&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>To single out probably the most capable browser available right now, used by millions of users worldwide, strikes me as wrong. Opera causes you problems? The only major problems you should have are those relating to <strong>badly-written markup</strong> or <strong>out-of-date scripts</strong>. Any minor problems can easily be catered for.</p>
<p>Each browser has layout differences. Firefox does not display things exactly the same as Opera, nor IE6/Win. Then there&#8217;s Safari et al. But if your code is valid, it should work in any major browser without hassle. Opera offers nothing to warrant blocking it completely.</p>
<p>Opera 8 (due any time now) offers many improvements. Opera 7 already has great support for CSS2.1 and some CSS3 &#8211; media queries, generated content, lots of things no-one can use much because Firefox or IE can&#8217;t handle them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Kyle again: <em>&#8220;On the other hand, I feel Opera changes it&#8217;s layout engine far too often, causing severe display difficulties distinguishing between different versions.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen no evidence of &#8220;severe&#8221; changes, and I&#8217;ve been testing in Opera since version 6. You could test for the different versions with the User Agent string though. Anyway, at least they&#8217;re constantly upgrading their browser, unlike a certain Redmond-based company I could mention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn ten Napel</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5341</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn ten Napel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Opera has got the message by now :-)


There is however a chicken and egg problem. We know that one very popular browser lacks a bit in comparable standards support. We also know that the same browser is very much targeted by web application developers in business.

To get developers to change their behaviour we need to educate them; this has been done by WASP and others for many years now. But when you tell developers &quot;This is the way it should be done&quot;, but their pet browser needs a set of CSS hacks I can understand the scepticism. (Practically we need to tell developers: your way of hacking is wrong, here is a new way of hacking).

Microsoft tells us &quot;we follow the demands of businesses&quot; (and that seems to be a succesful strategy) and businesses don&#039;t switch their way of working as long as Microsoft does not release a browser that supports at least the same set of standards as other mainstream browsers. How to break that cycle?

I have a little hope after reading Molly&#039;s comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Opera has got the message by now :-)</p>
<p>There is however a chicken and egg problem. We know that one very popular browser lacks a bit in comparable standards support. We also know that the same browser is very much targeted by web application developers in business.</p>
<p>To get developers to change their behaviour we need to educate them; this has been done by WASP and others for many years now. But when you tell developers &#8220;This is the way it should be done&#8221;, but their pet browser needs a set of CSS hacks I can understand the scepticism. (Practically we need to tell developers: your way of hacking is wrong, here is a new way of hacking).</p>
<p>Microsoft tells us &#8220;we follow the demands of businesses&#8221; (and that seems to be a succesful strategy) and businesses don&#8217;t switch their way of working as long as Microsoft does not release a browser that supports at least the same set of standards as other mainstream browsers. How to break that cycle?</p>
<p>I have a little hope after reading Molly&#8217;s comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ward</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to see WaSP seeing the mistake and working to rectify it (regardless of whether the mistake belongs to WaSP or those agents reporting on it). I don&#039;t envy them, since the browser climate is very much one of &#039;anti IE&#039;, regardless of their intervention. News sites are keen to write reports baiting Microsoft; Firefox fanbois and Internet Explorer fanbois throwing so much FUD at each other as to make a dreadful mess; misunderstandings and mistakes of message that get caught up in it all (we&#039;re all human after all)... it must be hard to have the real aims of WaSP that Eric and Molly speak of given fair representation.

So much of the time the &#039;browser wars&#039; get misreported as being &quot;Internet Explorer verses Web Standards&quot;, it just doesn&#039;t help anyone.

In some ways there is a calmness that comes from seeing over the media  circus that surrounds &#039;the state of IE&#039;, but I can&#039;t escape the fact that it ultimately hurts our cause and our profession to just single out IE as the pivotal villain.

(Oh, and just to stress, I don&#039;t mean to include any of the talented, honest and inspired web standards and browser product evangelists in my branding &quot;fanboi&quot;. I&#039;m sure you know the kinds of people that I do refer to).
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see WaSP seeing the mistake and working to rectify it (regardless of whether the mistake belongs to WaSP or those agents reporting on it). I don&#8217;t envy them, since the browser climate is very much one of &#8216;anti IE&#8217;, regardless of their intervention. News sites are keen to write reports baiting Microsoft; Firefox fanbois and Internet Explorer fanbois throwing so much FUD at each other as to make a dreadful mess; misunderstandings and mistakes of message that get caught up in it all (we&#8217;re all human after all)&#8230; it must be hard to have the real aims of WaSP that Eric and Molly speak of given fair representation.</p>
<p>So much of the time the &#8216;browser wars&#8217; get misreported as being &#8220;Internet Explorer verses Web Standards&#8221;, it just doesn&#8217;t help anyone.</p>
<p>In some ways there is a calmness that comes from seeing over the media  circus that surrounds &#8216;the state of IE&#8217;, but I can&#8217;t escape the fact that it ultimately hurts our cause and our profession to just single out IE as the pivotal villain.</p>
<p>(Oh, and just to stress, I don&#8217;t mean to include any of the talented, honest and inspired web standards and browser product evangelists in my branding &#8220;fanboi&#8221;. I&#8217;m sure you know the kinds of people that I do refer to).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly E. Holzschlag</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly E. Holzschlag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a member of WaSP and the de facto project manager on the Acid2 test, I have to say I actually agree with Eric.  The PR is off, which is definitely something that we&#039;ve been taken to task for via Robert Scoble.  Bottom line, Acid2 will be for all browsers, including Opera.

I do think that IE has the most to fix right now, and it&#039;s not unreasonable to want to grab the IE7 devs at this point and shake them up a bit, but I don&#039;t think the negative angle is a good one.  

The good news is Scoble has been helping negotiate relationships between WaSP and Microsoft on all levels - not just IE but the dev tools as well.  So that&#039;s something very cool that&#039;s come out of all this hot controversy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of WaSP and the de facto project manager on the Acid2 test, I have to say I actually agree with Eric.  The PR is off, which is definitely something that we&#8217;ve been taken to task for via Robert Scoble.  Bottom line, Acid2 will be for all browsers, including Opera.</p>
<p>I do think that IE has the most to fix right now, and it&#8217;s not unreasonable to want to grab the IE7 devs at this point and shake them up a bit, but I don&#8217;t think the negative angle is a good one.  </p>
<p>The good news is Scoble has been helping negotiate relationships between WaSP and Microsoft on all levels &#8211; not just IE but the dev tools as well.  So that&#8217;s something very cool that&#8217;s come out of all this hot controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5333</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can agree with you. I don&#039;t see IE as being the only culprit. In all honesty, Opera causes the most serious problems for me (our company no longer supports Opera by default). At least with IE you can use the &lt;--if[IE gt 5]--&gt; approach at last resort.   They&#039;ve made attempts to account for their browser&#039;s shortcomings, and will openly admit to them. On the other hand, I feel Opera changes it&#039;s layout engine far too often, causing severe display difficulties distinguishing between different versions - then blames the spec for their rendering issues. But, that&#039;s just my opinion.

So, no - it&#039;s not just IE. It&#039;s browsers in general.  If we can get the next generation of browsers to fully support CSS2 properties, and limited CSS3 support - maybe in 5 years we can really start moving forward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can agree with you. I don&#8217;t see IE as being the only culprit. In all honesty, Opera causes the most serious problems for me (our company no longer supports Opera by default). At least with IE you can use the &lt;&#8211;if[IE gt 5]&#8211;&gt; approach at last resort.   They&#8217;ve made attempts to account for their browser&#8217;s shortcomings, and will openly admit to them. On the other hand, I feel Opera changes it&#8217;s layout engine far too often, causing severe display difficulties distinguishing between different versions &#8211; then blames the spec for their rendering issues. But, that&#8217;s just my opinion.</p>
<p>So, no &#8211; it&#8217;s not just IE. It&#8217;s browsers in general.  If we can get the next generation of browsers to fully support CSS2 properties, and limited CSS3 support &#8211; maybe in 5 years we can really start moving forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riccard0</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5332</link>
		<dc:creator>riccard0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I haven&quot;t linked to [the original Acid test] because it seems to longer be available on the Web&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://style.cleverchimp.com/boxacidtest/vd/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is it. (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://tantek.com/log/2005/03.html#d12t1039&quot; title=&quot;Joining the WaSP Steering Committee&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tantek&lt;/a&gt;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I haven&#8221;t linked to [the original Acid test] because it seems to longer be available on the Web&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://style.cleverchimp.com/boxacidtest/vd/" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is it. (via <a href="http://tantek.com/log/2005/03.html#d12t1039" title="Joining the WaSP Steering Committee" rel="nofollow">Tantek</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5331</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The concern, I see, is that the focus is perceived to be on IE, so if Microsoft were to stand up to the plate and make IE work then public perception would be to stick with IE that other browsers wouldn&#039;t be needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concern, I see, is that the focus is perceived to be on IE, so if Microsoft were to stand up to the plate and make IE work then public perception would be to stick with IE that other browsers wouldn&#8217;t be needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/03/16.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Found it&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;While IE7 is the highest-profile target for obvious reasons, I can assure you that the test will reveal bugs in other browsers too -- including Opera and Firefox.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/03/16.html" rel="nofollow">Found it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>While IE7 is the highest-profile target for obvious reasons, I can assure you that the test will reveal bugs in other browsers too &#8212; including Opera and Firefox.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5329</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/03/23/that-acid-buzz/#comment-5329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read somewhere (can&#039;t remember where, sorry, not helpful, I know), that the news article was unduly focused on Internet Explorer, and that the Acid test &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; intended to challenge all browsers.  I&#039;ll have a look and see if I can find where I read that.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere (can&#8217;t remember where, sorry, not helpful, I know), that the news article was unduly focused on Internet Explorer, and that the Acid test <em>is</em> intended to challenge all browsers.  I&#8217;ll have a look and see if I can find where I read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->