You will get no disagreement from me in what you have qualified as “high-yield nuclear device[s]” nor from your comment regarding the traditional concept of a ‘dirty’ weapon, e.g. effective dispersion.

Back to the main point of your thread and objections to theft of copyrighted material or intellectual property published on the Web, if it is that valuable, do not publish it on the Web. Right or wrong, that is the nature of that beast. However, I can understand and appreciate the objections.

But I’m not going to back down on content theft just because the subject matter is so dire. Otherwise it would be permissible to steal any movie that dealt with the end of humanity or the world.

As for the post showing up in the technical feed, Greg’s right, I referenced HYDEsim and so I clicked the “Tools” category (as it’s a tool I built) and that landed it in the technical feed. Possibly that was inappropriate, but that’s what happens when your taxonomy isn’t as robust as perhaps it could be.

Good point and understood.

The greatest threat to any in-country operative is an educated and aware indigenous population. That said, a highly motivated, well trained, well financed and properly equipped lone individual is damn near impossible to stop.

Intellectual property to terrorism … all on a site dedicated to CSS. Gotta love the Web, huh. Oh, and Meyer’s tolerance.

thacker -
I’m worried about both. Sure, nuclear terrorism worries me but when the media drastically under-represents the dangers of the situation it creates a sense of reduced concern. That worries me – a lot.