<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIX Judging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/</link>
	<description>Things that Eric A. Meyer, CSS expert, writes about on his personal Web site; it&#039;s largely Web standards and Web technology, but also various bits of culture, politics, personal observations, and other miscellaneous stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/#comment-490670</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/?p=1242#comment-490670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is showing a lot of interest regarding HTML5. I&#039;ll be doing a full-day workshop at MIX and clearly Eric&#039;s involvement in this is positive - to be honest, quite a few standards evangelists have been involved with MIX over the years. The conference really does try to &quot;mix it up&quot; as the name implies.

What&#039;s more, there are several very strong open standards-oriented people at Microsoft. I know we all remain frustrated with IE6, but at least the company is keeping more open than a few of its &quot;competitors.&quot;

In re: AJAX - specifically if you&#039;re using XMLHttpRequest, you might recall that this was introduced by Microsoft in Internet Explorer 4.0 and made freely available for the W3C to spec out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is showing a lot of interest regarding HTML5. I&#8217;ll be doing a full-day workshop at MIX and clearly Eric&#8217;s involvement in this is positive &#8211; to be honest, quite a few standards evangelists have been involved with MIX over the years. The conference really does try to &#8220;mix it up&#8221; as the name implies.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, there are several very strong open standards-oriented people at Microsoft. I know we all remain frustrated with IE6, but at least the company is keeping more open than a few of its &#8220;competitors.&#8221;</p>
<p>In re: AJAX &#8211; specifically if you&#8217;re using XMLHttpRequest, you might recall that this was introduced by Microsoft in Internet Explorer 4.0 and made freely available for the W3C to spec out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meyer</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/#comment-490650</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/?p=1242#comment-490650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beth: same here, which is why I agreed to be a judge.

Scott: I don&#039;t know myself, but I think the answer is yes.

Nate: it&#039;s possible that you&#039;re right.  On the other hand, if they take that tack, lots of people will point out what you&#039;re saying about the interface stuff in the package and so on.  Very likely I&#039;d be among them.  There could even be a counter-contest:  what can you build with standards that&#039;s smaller than the Silverlight package?  That might be a lot of fun, actually...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth: same here, which is why I agreed to be a judge.</p>
<p>Scott: I don&#8217;t know myself, but I think the answer is yes.</p>
<p>Nate: it&#8217;s possible that you&#8217;re right.  On the other hand, if they take that tack, lots of people will point out what you&#8217;re saying about the interface stuff in the package and so on.  Very likely I&#8217;d be among them.  There could even be a counter-contest:  what can you build with standards that&#8217;s smaller than the Silverlight package?  That might be a lot of fun, actually&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Bundy</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/#comment-490629</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Bundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/?p=1242#comment-490629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, maybe it&#039;s just the cynic in me and I&#039;m being stupid, but somehow I think Microsoft is going to try and turn this into a &quot;look how much better Silverlight apps are than everything else for less size&quot; kind of deal.

Think of the amount of CSS and images needed to make a nice web interface. Yes, some very clever design and you can get a very nice looking interface with next to no images, but Silverlight has a bunch of extra interface stuff included in their package that won&#039;t count toward the 10K.

Hopefully I&#039;m wrong, and I suppose there is enough CSS3 in 3 out of the 5 browsers that perhaps it would be easier to pull some things off than I think.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, maybe it&#8217;s just the cynic in me and I&#8217;m being stupid, but somehow I think Microsoft is going to try and turn this into a &#8220;look how much better Silverlight apps are than everything else for less size&#8221; kind of deal.</p>
<p>Think of the amount of CSS and images needed to make a nice web interface. Yes, some very clever design and you can get a very nice looking interface with next to no images, but Silverlight has a bunch of extra interface stuff included in their package that won&#8217;t count toward the 10K.</p>
<p>Hopefully I&#8217;m wrong, and I suppose there is enough CSS3 in 3 out of the 5 browsers that perhaps it would be easier to pull some things off than I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Reynen</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/#comment-490626</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Reynen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/?p=1242#comment-490626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not clear to me from reading the rules, are AJAX calls allowed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not clear to me from reading the rules, are AJAX calls allowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2010/01/22/mix-judging/#comment-490606</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/?p=1242#comment-490606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very susprised and happy to see they didn&#039;t limit eligibility to MS proprietary technologies!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very susprised and happy to see they didn&#8217;t limit eligibility to MS proprietary technologies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->