<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When It Rains&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meyerweb.com/index.php?year=2006&#038;monthnum=07&#038;day=21&#038;name=when-it-rains&#038;feed=feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/</link>
	<description>Things that Eric A. Meyer, CSS expert, writes about on his personal Web site; it&#039;s largely Web standards and Web technology, but also various bits of culture, politics, personal observations, and other miscellaneous stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-40311</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-40311</guid>
		<description>Hey Eric,
  Just curious...do you read WIRED magazine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Eric,<br />
  Just curious&#8230;do you read WIRED magazine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will chatham</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-40185</link>
		<dc:creator>will chatham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-40185</guid>
		<description>Awww man...I was hoping to see a response to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1987181,00.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dvorak CSS column&lt;/a&gt; that has had everyone in a tizzy the last week.  Though, I guess it really speaks for itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awww man&#8230;I was hoping to see a response to the <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1987181,00.asp" rel="nofollow">Dvorak CSS column</a> that has had everyone in a tizzy the last week.  Though, I guess it really speaks for itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panos Stokas</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-40146</link>
		<dc:creator>Panos Stokas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-40146</guid>
		<description>Eric, I&#039;m currently on a so-called &quot;vacation&quot; in a small village on a mountain where in fact I am working on a database application. Some vacation, hugh?

Well The only available connection is a dialup line but for some reason the wires produce a humming sound that drops the signal to 24kbps (and that&#039;s for a lucent modem, other modems cannot even connect).

But comparing the pros and cons of the mountain village vs the noisy city, I&#039;d say 24kbps are enough :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I&#8217;m currently on a so-called &#8220;vacation&#8221; in a small village on a mountain where in fact I am working on a database application. Some vacation, hugh?</p>
<p>Well The only available connection is a dialup line but for some reason the wires produce a humming sound that drops the signal to 24kbps (and that&#8217;s for a lucent modem, other modems cannot even connect).</p>
<p>But comparing the pros and cons of the mountain village vs the noisy city, I&#8217;d say 24kbps are enough :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meyer</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39962</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 02:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-39962</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39898&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Matthew&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;

The Federal Marriage Amendment (to which you were implicitly referring in the second paragraph)...

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, I was implicitly referring to both the Federal Marriage Amendment and the Flag Desecration Amendment ,with the latter being foremost in my mind---thus the &quot;so hot to amend&quot; formulation.  Personally, I think my proposed amendment would be furlongs more useful than either of those cynically political panderings, but of course mine is not the only view in the world.  Just the only one represented in my blog entries.

&lt;blockquote&gt;

Can you show me a more glaring example of the courts ignoring stare decisis than the Massachusetts decision to allow gay marriage?

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Absolutely: the U.S. Supreme Court, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education_of_Topeka&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39898" rel="nofollow">Matthew</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Federal Marriage Amendment (to which you were implicitly referring in the second paragraph)&#8230;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, I was implicitly referring to both the Federal Marriage Amendment and the Flag Desecration Amendment ,with the latter being foremost in my mind&#8212;thus the &#8220;so hot to amend&#8221; formulation.  Personally, I think my proposed amendment would be furlongs more useful than either of those cynically political panderings, but of course mine is not the only view in the world.  Just the only one represented in my blog entries.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Can you show me a more glaring example of the courts ignoring stare decisis than the Massachusetts decision to allow gay marriage?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Absolutely: the U.S. Supreme Court, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education_of_Topeka" rel="nofollow">Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ximena</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ximena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-39937</guid>
		<description>Gee whiz, I use dialup.  Doesn&#039;t bother me.  You&#039;re just spoiled. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee whiz, I use dialup.  Doesn&#8217;t bother me.  You&#8217;re just spoiled. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric TF Bat</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39924</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric TF Bat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-39924</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always a good idea to keep a dial-up modem around so you can remind yourself how much better a light-weight CSS layout is than the old tables-and-split-GIFs of the olden days.  Also, it lets you experience the web from the point of view of people on Australia&#039;s biggest broadband carrier, who most days can&#039;t get much better than dial-up speeds.  And, best of all, it lets you think you&#039;ve time-travelled into the distant past, a bit like people who still think it&#039;s OK to treat people differently according to which kind of uglies they prefer to bump.  It&#039;s all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always a good idea to keep a dial-up modem around so you can remind yourself how much better a light-weight CSS layout is than the old tables-and-split-GIFs of the olden days.  Also, it lets you experience the web from the point of view of people on Australia&#8217;s biggest broadband carrier, who most days can&#8217;t get much better than dial-up speeds.  And, best of all, it lets you think you&#8217;ve time-travelled into the distant past, a bit like people who still think it&#8217;s OK to treat people differently according to which kind of uglies they prefer to bump.  It&#8217;s all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Brundage</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/07/21/when-it-rains/#comment-39898</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Brundage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=754#comment-39898</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Marriage_Amendment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Federal Marriage Amendment&lt;/a&gt; (to which you were implicitly referring in the second paragraph) was proposed by some Republicans in Congress to thwart the actions of rogue judges and public officials -- people who undermined the very foundations of the Constitution by creating &quot;rights&quot; out of whole cloth. It&#039;s quite sad when judges find rights in the Constitution that aren&#039;t explicitly stated (abortion, gay marriage) and ignore rights that &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; explicitly stated (gun rights, and basically the entire 9th Amendment).

Can you show me a more glaring example of the courts ignoring stare decisis than the Massachusetts decision to allow gay marriage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Marriage_Amendment" rel="nofollow">Federal Marriage Amendment</a> (to which you were implicitly referring in the second paragraph) was proposed by some Republicans in Congress to thwart the actions of rogue judges and public officials &#8212; people who undermined the very foundations of the Constitution by creating &#8220;rights&#8221; out of whole cloth. It&#8217;s quite sad when judges find rights in the Constitution that aren&#8217;t explicitly stated (abortion, gay marriage) and ignore rights that <b>are</b> explicitly stated (gun rights, and basically the entire 9th Amendment).</p>
<p>Can you show me a more glaring example of the courts ignoring stare decisis than the Massachusetts decision to allow gay marriage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
