<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitterific 1.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meyerweb.com/index.php?year=2007&#038;monthnum=01&#038;day=28&#038;name=twitterific-11&#038;feed=feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/01/28/twitterific-11/</link>
	<description>Things that Eric A. Meyer, CSS expert, writes about on his personal Web site; it&#039;s largely Web standards and Web technology, but also various bits of culture, politics, personal observations, and other miscellaneous stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Nested Float &#187; My Twitter Experiment&#8230;Concludes?</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/01/28/twitterific-11/#comment-100739</link>
		<dc:creator>The Nested Float &#187; My Twitter Experiment&#8230;Concludes?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=793#comment-100739</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers I read love/lurve it. There&#8217;s Anil Dash. There&#8217;s Dan Cederholm. There&#8217;s Eric Meyer (even if he does have his quibbles). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers I read love/lurve it. There&#8217;s Anil Dash. There&#8217;s Dan Cederholm. There&#8217;s Eric Meyer (even if he does have his quibbles). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McCann</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/01/28/twitterific-11/#comment-87196</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McCann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=793#comment-87196</guid>
		<description>And now I need to cry at my own ungrammatical sentences and unclosed brackets. Ah, must be time for a weekend...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now I need to cry at my own ungrammatical sentences and unclosed brackets. Ah, must be time for a weekend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McCann</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/01/28/twitterific-11/#comment-87194</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McCann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=793#comment-87194</guid>
		<description>Come on you guys: after the same of the two f&#039;s it might be worth getting the two r&#039;s in there. [OK, OK, I was about to write in grumbling about the fact that the name *should* have two r&#039;s, and surprisingly  managed to check the URL before compounding the nonsense! 

Think &quot;twit&quot; plus &quot;terrific&quot;, as in &quot;terrific twit&quot;.

Twitterrific!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on you guys: after the same of the two f&#8217;s it might be worth getting the two r&#8217;s in there. [OK, OK, I was about to write in grumbling about the fact that the name *should* have two r&#8217;s, and surprisingly  managed to check the URL before compounding the nonsense! </p>
<p>Think &#8220;twit&#8221; plus &#8220;terrific&#8221;, as in &#8220;terrific twit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Twitterrific!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2007/01/28/twitterific-11/#comment-86573</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meyerweb.com/?p=793#comment-86573</guid>
		<description>Despite all the improvements in 1.1, I still find Twitterific to be horrifically flawed in a number of irritating ways.

Firstly, since the application runs as a menubar item only (no Dock item or anything you can &#039;switch&#039; to via option-tab) the &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; way to quit it is to open the Options page and clicking the Quit button. And the only way of doing &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is to open the Twitterific window itself and click the little Options icon (and what&#039;s up with the program having a menu bar icon that doesn&#039;t actually open a menu?).

Secondly, despite now having the ability to act more like a &#039;normal&#039; window it still has some odd quirks with its behaviour when open. In my mind, normal windows shouldn&#039;t appear and disappear without user intervention, and so when I find that I&#039;m scrolling through the list of recent twitters after the window has appeared, only for it to &lt;em&gt;disappear&lt;/em&gt; on me suddenly... well, you get the idea!

The window itself behaves oddly in terms of focus and current tweet being shown (what&#039;s the point of popping up to show an old tweet just because that was the last thing selected before it disappeared? Change the selection to the new one!) and I can&#039;t figure for the life of me why they chose that 141 character arbitrary limit (why not deduct the username length from the max message length? People like Tantek grabbed the short usernames but they miss out on a few valuable characters in a limited medium).

I can&#039;t help but feel that Twitterific is a lovely-looking but poorly behaved app, somewhat like that Disco CD burner. It has a nice icon, the translucent solid-colour window with rounded edges is really easy on the eye, but it doesn&#039;t function too well. I still reckon a proper Window-based application with (optional) Growl integration would work far better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite all the improvements in 1.1, I still find Twitterific to be horrifically flawed in a number of irritating ways.</p>
<p>Firstly, since the application runs as a menubar item only (no Dock item or anything you can &#8216;switch&#8217; to via option-tab) the <em>only</em> way to quit it is to open the Options page and clicking the Quit button. And the only way of doing <em>that</em> is to open the Twitterific window itself and click the little Options icon (and what&#8217;s up with the program having a menu bar icon that doesn&#8217;t actually open a menu?).</p>
<p>Secondly, despite now having the ability to act more like a &#8216;normal&#8217; window it still has some odd quirks with its behaviour when open. In my mind, normal windows shouldn&#8217;t appear and disappear without user intervention, and so when I find that I&#8217;m scrolling through the list of recent twitters after the window has appeared, only for it to <em>disappear</em> on me suddenly&#8230; well, you get the idea!</p>
<p>The window itself behaves oddly in terms of focus and current tweet being shown (what&#8217;s the point of popping up to show an old tweet just because that was the last thing selected before it disappeared? Change the selection to the new one!) and I can&#8217;t figure for the life of me why they chose that 141 character arbitrary limit (why not deduct the username length from the max message length? People like Tantek grabbed the short usernames but they miss out on a few valuable characters in a limited medium).</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but feel that Twitterific is a lovely-looking but poorly behaved app, somewhat like that Disco CD burner. It has a nice icon, the translucent solid-colour window with rounded edges is really easy on the eye, but it doesn&#8217;t function too well. I still reckon a proper Window-based application with (optional) Growl integration would work far better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
