Okay, so yesterday’s post was a bit of tongue-in-cheekery, but with a very serious undertone. As a matter of fact, today Kat, Carolyn, and I went to a doctor’s appointment, then to vote, and then out to lunch. When we got back, there were two voice mail messages. I laid 3:1 odds that they were both political, and yes, they were both GOP ads. While we were retrieving those messages, another message landed in our voice mail box—this one also from the GOP.
The flood of political calls has been, not to put too fine a point on it, infuriating. I signed up with the Do Not Call list for a reason, geniuses. I’m doubly glad to be on it now that we have Carolyn. I’m not especially concerned that the phone will wake her, bless her heart; once she goes to deep sleep, you could practically send a marching band through her room to play “Columbia, The Gem Of The Ocean” at full volume and she’d continue snoring. (Such cute little snores they are, too.) But some nights, especially when the teething is particularly bad, she never really gets to a deep sleep. The last thing I want is for her to be woken up by a ringing phone and experience more pain because some politician or political activist thinks I really need to hear from him (or her). I don’t. Stop bothering me.
Now, I’ll admit that my vote for President was never in serious doubt. It was easier to justify, though, on the grounds that Kerry and his allies had invaded my family’s privacy to a lesser extent than did his opponents. It’s a classic “lesser of two evils” rationalization, but hey, any port in an electoral storm. It’s also a metaphor for the Bush administration’s stance on social and privacy issues, now that I think about it.
And why was my vote never in serious doubt? I can explain that in ten words (16 words and three letters if you count the names).
|Eric A. Meyer||Liberal||Conservative|
|George W. Bush||Conservative||Liberal|
|John F. Kerry||Liberal||Liberal|
That’s it in a nutshell. I’ve had a number problems with the Bush administration’s policies and actions, and most of them stem from the differences in philosophy that table summarizes.
There’s another reason I voted for Kerry, though: the Congress is almost certainly not going to be controlled by the Democrats. Thus, the only things that will get through the legislative process are those with broad support. Most observers feel that should Kerry win, he’ll have to set aside some of his grander (read: more expensive) plans for at least the first two years of his administration. That’s just fine with me. Since a Republican-dominated government apparently can’t show a sense of fiscal restraint, I’d be happy to have it arise as a side effect of an opposite-party government.
Well, not exactly happy, really, but hopefully you know what I mean.
It’ll certainly be interesting to watch how all this plays out. Now, if you haven’t yet, get out there and vote!