It’s been very nearly two years since the last time, and that’s way too long. So: it’s time for another caption hunt!
Leave your caption(s) in the comments. Who knows? There might even be a prize or two involved.
(Update: comments are now enabled. Oopsie.)
When it isn’t buried under a flood tide of web geeks, band groupies, and filmgoers, Austin is a nice little town.
Or maybe it’s just a nice little downtown; thanks to a visit with Angela and Dan, I found that the greater Austin area is a good deal larger and more urban than I’d realized, not to mention growing at a rapid clip. At any rate, being there for An Event Apart Austin was markedly different than the SXSW experience (in which I’ll once again be partaking, come March) just by dint of not being nearly so noisy.
While we didn’t contribute too much noise to the area, I fervently hope that we added a whole lot of signal. I know that from my spot on the charmingly petite stage at the Alamo Drafthouse Downtown, the people in the audience really seemed to be enjoying themselves, and I at least felt like I was communicating well. I think the other speakers did too, so hopefully they got the same feeling.
Part of that, without question, was due to just how friendly and welcoming the audience was. We had a few glitches here and there, but so far as I could tell, nobody let it get them down. As we said to ourselves a few times, “When you choose quirky venues, you get quirk”. I still really enjoy putting on events in not-the-usual-suspects places like the Alamo, and I’ll miss that aspect of AEA when it grows larger, but it’s definitely the case that you take your chances at a smaller venue. I think we did well at the Alamo, and several attendees mentioned how cool it was to attend an event there. I’m glad we picked it.
It’s still a gamble, though, and after a year of AEAs, I understand better than ever why so many conferences and other events are held in hotel ballrooms. It may be bland and a little soulless, but as a presenter, you know they’ve done it all a thousand times before. You know they can handle any routine problem, and in fact have. It’s comforting. You give up charm and funkiness, but in return you get stability.
I think there’s an analogy to dating in there somewhere, but I’m not going to pursue it.
After we were all done with the speechifying, the fine folks at Knowbility threw an after-party on the upstairs terrace of The Belmont, and a good time was had by all, what with the open bar and all. I even got to meet and talk with Jim Thatcher, the man responsible for PCSAID, one of the first screen readers.
If you’re wondering what it all looked like, or if you were there and want to relive the moments, there’s (as ever) a Flickr pool for your perusal. I threw in a few pictures of my own, including one for those of you who’ve ever wondered about the view from the stage. The Austin Flickr pool even has, somewhere in its depths, a picture of me being a naughty boy. Find it if you can!
All in all, the folks in Austin made it a great end to the 2006 AEA season, so thanks, y’all! I always like to finish on a high note. We’re going to take a little break in the AEA schedule while the event gets retooled and expanded. We haven’t officially announced the next show, but I’ll let you in on a little secret, just between us: it looks to be in Boston at the end of March 2007, it’ll be two days long, and I already want to see and hear our lineup of speakers. More when we have official word, which hopefully should come within the next week or so.
Forty-eight hours after landing in Cleveland, I took off again. I’d come back from AEA Seattle, and was leaving for the Webmaster Jam Session in Dallas, Texas.
I was interested to discover how much Dallas reminded me of my home town. Both cities have urban downtowns of moderate stature and minimal residence. Everyone lives in the suburbs, it seems, and at night the city center goes quiet. People in other cities might read that as a slam, but it honestly doesn’t bother me. A teeming, noisy nightlife is not the only (or even the primary) indicator of a healthy city.
As for the conference, it was a great time. The gang at CoffeeCup Software understand something critical: that webmastering is not just about code and layout. There were sessions on branding, for example. I got a lot out of the excellent presentation given by John Moore, which drew on his long experience in the marketing department at Starbucks. I believe that what I learned there will be of use in guiding the evolution and growth of An Event Apart. There were also talks on finding the right hosting provider, ways to promote your site, and more. And then there was the keynote, from that Eric wotsizname, you know, the CSS dude. It seemed to go just fine, given that he was trying to pack ten years into an hour.
The other thing I noticed was that, for a first-time conference, the whole thing was run very professionally. I know how hard that is to do, and I was quite impressed. Kudos all around!
Like Seattle, I only was able to contribute a few pictures to the general pool, both because I was often too busy to haul out the camera and because my PowerShot S45 was approaching collapse. Still, I got a nice picture of the twilit Dallas skyline, so even in near-death, the old battlewagon came through.
With AEA Austin looming just ahead, it’s probably well past time for me to say something about AEA Seattle. Hey, what’s a couple of months between friends?
I’ve only been to Seattle once before, not counting a plane-to-car connection on my way to Vancouver, and that was four years ago for Web Design World. I didn’t get a lot of time to see the city back then, so I was glad to get in a day early for AEA and hang out with Jeffrey. As it turns out, we spent most of that Sunday exploring the Pike Street Market. You might think that wouldn’t be a particularly lengthy or interesting activity, but for Jeffrey and me, there were many and varied delights to be found in the nooks and crannies of the sprawling complex.
Also, we were there just at the height of the Fifth Annual Buskers’ Festival, so there was quite a variety of entertainment to be had. All in all, I had a great time drinking in some of the local flavor of Seattle, even if I passed on drinking coffee at the original Starbucks. We put some photos up on Flickr, though not so many of mine as of Jeffrey’s. There is also the usual event Flickr pool, if you’re in to that sort of thing.
The event itself was great. The venue, the Bell Harbor International Conference Center, was flat-out fantastic. I had no idea there was a venue possessing an entire auditorium filled with Aeron chairs and stable wifi, but there it was, and we were in it. Lights, sound, projection—everything was top-notch and seamless. For anyone who wants to do an event for 200 – 300 people, I’d definitely look at Bell Harbor. They have some smaller rooms as well, and while they might not be quite as sweet as the main auditorium, the professional service would be no different.
Our feedback indicates that people liked what they heard, except me during the critiques. Apparently, I came off as something of a jerk. I’d been aiming for humorously blunt, which in retrospect was a mis-step—not because it came off wrong, but because it’s a poor fit for my public demeanor, which is why it came off wrong. Live and learn.
So belated thanks to everyone who came down to the waterfront to see us do our thing, including one person from deep in my past… but that story will have to wait for another time.
Cripes. In preparing to mention some upcoming appearances, I realized I’d never gotten around to mentioning a couple of events in the recent past; specifically, AEA Seattle and the Webmaster Jam Session. I’ll get to those in the next couple of posts, and then fire off a couple of reviews.
What I called you all here for, though, was to pass along news of an upcoming two-continent microtour. Yes! You can almost feel the white-hot spirit energy of this global adventure, can’t you? I know I can, and unless I’m very much mistaken, I see it in your eyes too.
It’s a special thing we’ve just shared. Don’t tell anyone else.
The festivities will start with my return to London (UK, not Ohio) for a two-day Carson Workshop on December 7th and 8th. You can learn more at the Carson Workshops site, of course. I hear tell that a goodly chunk of the limited seating has already been claimed. In the course of the two days, I’ll be leading an expedition into the very heart of CSS. From the darkest, thorniest jungles to the spectacular hidden vistas glimpsed only by a few lucky souls we will travel, and those who emerge alive will truly be a band of brothers and sisters.
Since I’ll already be in London on the date, might there be a stop by the BBC Backstage Bash? Could be. Could very well be.
From the sun-kissed shores of wild England, I’ll wing my way to verdant Boston for Web Design World. It will be there that I will spend half a day—said day being December 11th—presenting a condensed version of some parts of the content covered in London, an overland flight giving us an idea of where the previous week’s group blazed a mighty trail. Yes, I’d like to present it all, but since I have not (yet) fully asserted dominance over the flow of time, I have no way to fit two days into half a day. It would be like trying to fit a Danish prince inside a nutshell. No matter how you or he may espouse theories of some fabled infinite space to be ruled within that diminuitive husk, homey just won’t fit.
My work in Boston having been completed, I will make my way homeward at last, nearly a full week and many thounsands of miles after leaving it, tired but triumphant, ready to face the New Year and all the changes it will bring.
So now you know. And as well we know, knowing is half the battle.
(For those who might be in the know, a bonus prize to anyone who can identify the web site and author I was homage-ing in this post. Not parodying! No no! I’m not sure such a thing would be possible in any event.)
This morning I got word in my RSS feeds that Google has launched what they call “customized search engines” through Google Co-Op. As a test, I created a CSS search engine. Go ahead, try it out.
There are two ways to configure a custom search engine. One is to search the whole web but emphasize the sites you list. The other is to search only the sites you list. While the second might seem to be overly restrictive, the first doesn’t really seem very useful, at least for a CSS search engine. When I compared the “CSS search” to “Web search” results, they really didn’t differ all that much—in some cases, having the same ten results on the first page, but in a slightly different order. On occasion, the “Web search” ordering was actually more useful.
So I set up the CSS search to be restricted to the sites I listed, which I thought seemed relatively useful. Only whenever I run the search from meyerweb instead of within Google, I get the “whole Web” search instead of the “only my sites search”, which either means I’m doing something wrong or I’m just too early an adopter. Hopefully it’ll work as intended for you. (Update: it seems to be working as intended now.)
Anyway, I’m not about to pretend that the six sites I included constitute the entirety of sites with useful CSS information. Thus, I’ve set up the CSS search to be open to any volunteers. If you have a Google Co-Op account (which I think is just any old Google developer account, such as you might have created for Google Maps) or want to create one, you can add sites to the ‘approved’ list without any say-so on my part. Though I do have the power to boot sites that aren’t relevant, or too far out of date, or that look at me cross-eyed, or whatever. To do so, I think you click the “Edit this seach engine” link on my CSS Search home page and then click on “Collaboration” to volunteer. Or you might be able to go directly there. I have to accept volunteers, so kindly be patient if it takes me a day or three. And I’m going to simply reject any anonymous volunteers—sorry if that’s you.
For those that don’t have or want a Google account, feel free to suggest sites in the comments here. In terms of getting them actually added, you’ll be at the mercy of my free time; but then again, so am I.
Once I got a look at the markup of my latest Vitamin piece, “Stand Up For Your Rights!“, I winced. Four paragraphs, with each alternating bit of dialogue separated by a line break? Ay caramba!
And yet, I’m not sure I could have done better, structurally speaking. The only semi-reasonable alternative that comes to mind is a set of four blockquotes with paragraphs instead of line breaks, but that doesn’t work for me. They are, after all, invented conversations. I’m not quoting anything.
Maybe paragraphed text with a div, possibly classed, for each section (yes, all right, each division) of the article would have been a better choice. Or maybe not. What do you think?
Looks like the idea of a professional organization for web designers is back in the feeds. Mark Boulton, after listening to the Hot Topics panel from @media 2006, had quite a bit to say about the idea. Richard Rutter followed up with thoughts of his own, and then D. Keith Robinson chimed in. There are probably more posts out there by more people, because this is one of those topics that just spreads like a virus, infecting host after host with a copy of itself. (If you have one, feel free to drop a link in the comments.)
Since Mark started things off by mentioning my comments about education being behind the times (but didn’t actually link to me like he did everyone else; where’s the love, Mark?), I’ll start there. I still hold that certification is much too premature for our field. Even if we could wave a wand and create a good set of certification criteria in the next week, it would be out of date within a year. Anything that wouldn’t go out of date that quickly would be so basic as to make a mockery of the whole idea of certifying someone as competent in the field.
I’ll concede that if a relatively well-funded organization took on the task of creating and (more crucially) keeping up to date the criteria, they could be kept useful. Hey, maybe an independent W3C! Well, it’s a thought.
The deeper problem is in deciding what constitutes professional competence. Does using AJAX get you bonus points, or automatically disqualified? Does absolutely everything a developer produces have to validate, even if that breaks layout or interactive features in one or more browsers? Web design isn’t like chemistry, where the precipitate either forms or it doesn’t. If chemical engineers had to work in conditions equivalent to web developers, they’d have to mix their solutions in several parallel universes, each one with different physical constants, and get the same result in all of them.
Richard’s take is that certification could be based on relevant education and cross-discipline experience. Well, that leaves me out: my degree in History isn’t likely to be considered relevant. Then again, I’m not actually a web designer, so maybe Richard’s organization isn’t for me. I might be considered a developer, but on the other hand, maybe I’m just a technology writer and need to go apply for membership in their club.
Richard’s approach doesn’t really seem to make the “what qualifies” problem go away so much as it abstract it into a non-issue. You just have to have experience in a discipline. Nobody says it has to be particularly good or bad—though evaluating that would, apparently, be up to the peers who review your application. This introduces an interesting subjective element, one that I think may feel foreign to those of us who like to work with computers. In any organization composed of humans, of course, you’re not going to get away from subjectivity.
In all this, though, the people who are interested in creating a professionals’ organization will have to answer a fairly tough question. Given that both the World Organization of Webmasters and HTML Writers Guild already exist and offer certification, why aren’t they more widely known or highly regarded, and how will any proposed organization do better? What will make it better or more influential?
Of everyone, I think Keith’s got the best idea with his proposed professionals’ network. It’s probably game-able, but heck, so is entrance into a professional society. I know I’d be very interested in participating in such a network, especially one that let people indicate who they’ve worked with, and on what. Analyzing those link patterns could be endlessly fascinating. If it includes community features similar to those of the original MeetUp, thus encouraging physical meetings of members, as well as the endorsement and networking features of LinkedIn, I’d be there in a hot second.
So… who wants to start forming the team to make that network come alive?